Skip to content
CVE Tracker
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API documentationPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • AboutPage
  • How it's builtPage
Back

CVE-2023-54232

m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table

Not scoredEPSS 0.21%
Published
Updated
Reserved
Assigned by
Linux

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table __get_kernel_nofault() does copy data in supervisor mode when forcing a task backtrace log through /proc/sysrq_trigger. This is expected cause a bus error exception on e.g. NULL pointer dereferencing when logging a kernel task has no workqueue associated. This bus error ought to be ignored. Our 030 bus error handler is ill equipped to deal with this: Whenever ssw indicates a kernel mode access on a data fault, we don't even attempt to handle the fault and instead always send a SEGV signal (or panic). As a result, the check for exception handling at the fault PC (buried in send_sig_fault() which gets called from do_page_fault() eventually) is never used. In contrast, both 040 and 060 access error handlers do not care whether a fault happened on supervisor mode access, and will call do_page_fault() on those, ultimately honoring the exception table. Add a check in bus_error030 to call do_page_fault() in case we do have an entry for the fault PC in our exception table. I had attempted a fix for this earlier in 2019 that did rely on testing pagefault_disabled() (see link below) to achieve the same thing, but this patch should be more generic. Tested on 030 Atari Falcon.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Deferred.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.21% · top 89% of all CVEs (6 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < 1a6059f5ed57f48edfe7159404ff7d538d9d405b
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < f55cb52ec98b22125f5bda36391edb8894f7e8cf
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < 2100e374251a8fc00cce1916cfc50f3cb652cbe3
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < df1da53a7e98f0b2a0eb2241c154f148f2f2c1d8
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < 8bf8d5dade4c5e1d8a2386f29253ed28b5d87735
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < 54fa25ffab2b700df5abd58c136d64a912c53953
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < ec15405b80fc15ffc87a23d01378ae061c1aba07
    • affected f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84 – < e36a82bebbf7da814530d5a179bef9df5934b717
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2.6.18
    • unaffected < 2.6.18
    • unaffected 4.14.312 – ≤ 4.14.*
    • unaffected 4.19.280 – ≤ 4.19.*
    • unaffected 5.4.240 – ≤ 5.4.*
    • unaffected 5.10.177 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.105 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.22 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.2.9 – ≤ 6.2.*
    • unaffected 6.3 – ≤ *

References (8)

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2023-54232 badge
[![CVE-2023-54232](https://trackcve.app/badge/CVE-2023-54232.svg)](https://trackcve.app/cve/CVE-2023-54232)

Record last updated .