CVE-2024-6762
Jetty PushSessionCacheFilter can cause remote DoS attacks
- Published
- Updated
- Reserved
- Assigned by
- eclipse
Description
Jetty PushSessionCacheFilter can be exploited by unauthenticated users to launch remote DoS attacks by exhausting the server’s memory.
Timeline
ID reserved
By eclipse
- 3 months later
· 3 months later
Published
- 13 months later
· 13 months later
Record updated
Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.
Scores
| Scored by | CVSS | Score | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| eclipseCNA (assigner) | 3.1 | Low3.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
| NVDNVD · Modified | 3.1 | Medium6.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
- EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
- 0.94% · top 39% of all CVEs (7 Nov 2026)
- CISA SSVC
- Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Low 3.1.
Weakness
Affected products
- affected 10.0.0 – ≤ 10.0.17
- affected 11.0.0 – ≤ 11.0.17
- affected 12.0.0 – ≤ 12.0.3
Affected packages
From reviewed advisories of the GitHub Advisory Database.
- Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servletsGHSA-r7m4-f9h5-gr79 (opens in a new tab)
What to do
Workaround: The session usage is intrinsic to the design of the PushCacheFilter. The issue can be avoided by: * not using the PushCacheFilter. Push has been deprecated by the various IETF specs and early hints responses should be used instead. * reducing the reducing the idle timeout on unauthenticated sessions will reduce the time such session stay in memory. * configuring a session cache to use session passivation https://jetty.org/docs/jetty/12/programming-guide/server/session.html , so that sessions are not stored in memory, but rather in a database or file system that may have significantly more capacity than memory.
References (7)
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-r7m4-f9h5-gr79 (opens in a new tab)
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/24 (opens in a new tab)
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/9715 (opens in a new tab)
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/9716 (opens in a new tab)
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/10756 (opens in a new tab)
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/10755 (opens in a new tab)
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/04/msg00001.html (opens in a new tab)
Sources
The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.
- CVE.org record (opens in a new tab)
- CVE List JSON (GitHub) (opens in a new tab)
- NVD (opens in a new tab)
- FIRST EPSS (opens in a new tab)
- OSV.dev (opens in a new tab)
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-r7m4-f9h5-gr79 (opens in a new tab)
- CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup (opens in a new tab)
Badge for a README or a ticket
[](https://trackcve.app/cve/CVE-2024-6762)Record last updated .