Skip to content
CVE Tracker
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API documentationPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • AboutPage
  • How it's builtPage
Back

CVE-2026-0799

OOBR and OOBW in libpcap before 1.10.7

High8.7EPSS 0.11%
Published
Updated
Reserved
Assigned by
Tcpdump

Description

In BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-0799, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
TcpdumpCNA (assigner)3.1High8.7CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H
NVDNVD · Awaiting Analysis3.1High8.7CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.11% · top 99% of all CVEs (5 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 8.7.

Weakness

Affected products

What to do

Solution: Upgrade to libpcap 1.10.7.

Workaround: Validate every filter program that has not been produced by a local call to pcap_compile().

Exploitation: A functional exploit exists.

References (1)

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-0799 badge
[![CVE-2026-0799](https://trackcve.app/badge/CVE-2026-0799.svg)](https://trackcve.app/cve/CVE-2026-0799)

Record last updated .