Skip to content
TrackCVE
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API documentationPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • AboutPage
  • How it's builtPage
Back

CVE-2026-46054

selinux: fix overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() access checks

High7.1EPSS 0.12%
Published
Updated
Reserved
Assigned by
Linux

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux: fix overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() access checks The existing SELinux security model for overlayfs is to allow access if the current task is able to access the top level file (the "user" file) and the mounter's credentials are sufficient to access the lower level file (the "backing" file). Unfortunately, the current code does not properly enforce these access controls for both mmap() and mprotect() operations on overlayfs filesystems. This patch makes use of the newly created security_mmap_backing_file() LSM hook to provide the missing backing file enforcement for mmap() operations, and leverages the backing file API and new LSM blob to provide the necessary information to properly enforce the mprotect() access controls.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 14 days later

    Published

  3. · 5 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-46054, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.1CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
redhat-SADPADP (enrichment)3.1High7.0CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1High7.1CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.12% · top 98% of all CVEs (7 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.1.

Weakness

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2f502839e85ab265f03f25f30d6463154aee5473 – < bc6c380c1159de52a252ed11f19a42c47f60a735
    • affected 2f502839e85ab265f03f25f30d6463154aee5473 – < 8bacd09f12c27710228562e4d13163e58c5f4a45
    • affected 2f502839e85ab265f03f25f30d6463154aee5473 – < d844702198395d3f80222777030f69db6be6b709
    • affected 2f502839e85ab265f03f25f30d6463154aee5473 – < cd0e707a927a70cdfd8bc5a512a9719a87f5ed51
    • affected 2f502839e85ab265f03f25f30d6463154aee5473 – < 82544d36b1729153c8aeb179e84750f0c085d3b1
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 4.19
    • unaffected < 4.19
    • unaffected 6.6.144 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.95 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.38 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.0.4 – ≤ 7.0.*
    • unaffected 7.1 – ≤ *

References (20)

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-46054 badge
[![CVE-2026-46054](https://trackcve.app/badge/CVE-2026-46054.svg)](https://trackcve.app/cve/CVE-2026-46054)

Record last updated .