Skip to content
CVE Tracker
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API documentationPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • AboutPage
  • How it's builtPage
Back

CVE-2026-54890

BEAM VM crash via integer underflow in binary_to_term BIT_BINARY_EXT decoding

High8.2EPSS 0.42%
Published
Updated
Reserved
Assigned by
EEF

Description

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) vulnerability in erlang otp erlang/otp (erts modules), erlang otp erts (erts modules) allows Forced Integer Overflow, Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files erts/emulator/beam/external.c, emulator/beam/external.c. The BIT_BINARY_EXT tag (77) handler in the External Term Format (ETF) decoder accepts an encoding with both length and trailing-bits fields set to zero. The subsequent computation of the bitstring size underflows an unsigned integer, producing a value of roughly 2^64 that is then passed as a memory allocation size. The allocator aborts the entire node with a message such as "Cannot allocate 2305843009213693951 bytes of memory (of type binary)". The crash is a VM-level abort, not an Erlang-level exception. It cannot be intercepted by supervision trees, by try/catch, or by passing the [safe] option to binary_to_term/2 (which only restricts atom creation and does not perform structural validation of binary encodings). Any application that decodes ETF from untrusted sources via binary_to_term/1,2 or enif_binary_to_term() is exposed. The Erlang distribution protocol also decodes incoming terms through the same code path, but distribution is expected to run on trusted networks per the OTP Secure Coding Guidelines (DSG-011). This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 29.0.4, OTP 28.5.0.4 and OTP 27.3.4.15, corresponding to erts from 15.0 before 17.0.4, 16.4.0.4 and 15.2.7.11.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-54890, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
EEFCNA (assigner)4.0High8.2CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
NVDNVD · Analyzed4.0High8.2CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.42% · top 63% of all CVEs (5 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 8.2.

Weakness

Affected products

  • Erlang · OTP

    • affected 15.0 – < *
  • Erlang · OTP

    • affected 27.0 – < *
    • affected 24ef4cbaeda9b9c26682cba75f2f15b0c58722aa – < dc1bf9344c0ce62717cf60866590cea0242780fd

What to do

Workaround: Do not call binary_to_term/1,2 or enif_binary_to_term() on data from untrusted sources. The OTP Secure Coding Guidelines (DSG-011) recommend avoiding these functions altogether on untrusted input and using an alternative serialization format (for example JSON or Protocol Buffers) instead.

References (5)

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-54890 badge
[![CVE-2026-54890](https://trackcve.app/badge/CVE-2026-54890.svg)](https://trackcve.app/cve/CVE-2026-54890)

Record last updated .